WARNING:THIS ARTICLE MAY SERIOUSLY CHALLENGE YOUR VIEW OF THE WORLD, SO IF YOURE NOT USED TO YOUR IDEAS BEING CHALLENGED,STOP READING,CHOOSE ANOTHER ONE. I COULD WRITE ON RABBITS MAYBE.
Azimah called me two days ago, and she told me of the coming of Yusuf estes to malaysia. He is to give a series of talks, and the first one that i was able to attend, was last night’s.. titled why should we believe in god? It quickly struck a chord and i just opted to go.
It was at Malaya university hosted by their islamic studies department and Al-khadem foundation. Of course after the usual formalities, being welcoming speech and the technical problems, i finally get to see Yusuf estes metres away from me. I had first seen him in a video showed in islamic awareness week in otago. The man knows how to command the attention of the audience. His powerful intonation, his eloquence, and his ability for humour makes him a very well equipped preacher. Wish a lot more of muslims would learn to improve themselves to prepare for the challenges of the current times.
In order to prepare the audience, he started with an anthropological argument arguing for the probable existence of God. He quoted an anthropologist who studied languages and found that the word God existed in all languages, even for the primitive ones, and he quoted an example of a language that had only about a 100 words. He went on further and say that humans only create a word for something that exists, the sattellite, the microwave are two examples that he gave.
Then he spoke of how ancient civilisations had depictions of God in various symbol to show that God has always been a subject among mankind. What i’d like to say at this juncture is that this might suggest probability that God exists, but surely, if someone coins words like the middle earth, isengard or faires and Goblins one does not expext these things to exist now? And if one takes this argument further, in one’s asessment of mythology and symbolisms, humans create myth in order that they may make a better sense of this world, and to survive.
Take for example the existence of fairies that help mend your shoes(or maybe help finish your essay), you may create the concept in order that you could live sanely with an evil employer, or mothers might cling on to Batu belah batu bertangkup in order to deal with her naughty kids.
Psycho Analysts like freud in future of an illusion,even dawkins sensational God’s delusion suggest that God is a myth created by the oedipus complex suffered by everyone who make God to be an extremely powerful father whom when angered causes disaster in the soil, Hence when yusuf estes says of how the victims of earthquake become extremely good humans, this is because of uncertainty and sense of helplessness, the state of fitrah he calls it, and ironically it is the one that children posess.
Other than that, he tried to prove the existence of god by showing that evolution is false(the likes of harun yahya), and that sense verifiability isnt conclusive in supposing the existence of something.
He attacks the atheist in the common argument that the atheist professor must not have a brain if he does not see it, hear it,feel it smell it or touch it. But the problem with these arguments is that, it does not work! I will deal with evolution in the next article because it deserves it’s own post.
Let me first say that sense verifiability need not be something that one can immediately see, but a conscillience of inductions is good proof for the existence of something. For example that the earth is spherical and that the sun does not revolve around the earth, or that there is signal in your cell phone. Very few have actually seen the earth from outer space to conclude of it’s sphericity.
And some for example still think that the moon landing was a hoax. What do you have then? Well that the earth was spherical was already known even in the time of aristotle. He based his finding on the shadow of the sun during eclipses, the disappearing of ships from a port, and also the rotation of stars. But he has not apprehended directly the sphericity of the earth. BUt inductions, or signs tells him so.
What about vitamins, zinc and so forth? have you seen felt, or tasted vitamins?(not the tablet, but the chemical component), how do you know it exists? Again from inductions. Similarly your cell phone line and so on and so forth. Science does not expect you to prove something by immediate sense experience, but it is sufficient that you can conceive of a way to verify it sensibly. For example, that there are mountains behind the moon, one can conceive of sending a satellite to take pictures of it. Similarly with my brain, one can dissect it to see whether it exists. Or if one wants to go with induction,
than the existence of my brain can be attested with my behaviour. For example humans that have brains can pass the mirror test, is capable of uttering signals(words) that signify the signified(meaningful words).
So how bout the existence of God then? Well let me give you a picture of a man stranded in an island, who was born with no hands and no feet(or got chopped of during his baby days by rocks if you wana be creative and sadistic). There are no animals on this island except for insects(so light they dont live foot prints). Now, if one day he sees a foot print, what do you think he will actually say?That there are animals/humans that leaves foot prints?
Or will he think that someone has probably drawn some cute shapes with his mouth? Now similarly the god hypotheses is the same, there is no sense verifiable way we can prove his existence because He is nothing like His creation. Laisa ka mithli hi shay’un(nothing is like him in His creation)
We are incapable of comprehending what god is like. God cannot be defined because He cannot be limited to words even if its 99 words. One can only know HIm trough His attributes and His actions, again, inductions.
Hence the question i posed yusuf estes(title of this post) my intention was not to disprove the existence of god, It is rather to invite the muslims and the believers to improve on their idea of god and their conducts as muslims. That they shouldnt imagine God or Make God as a justifier of their religious fanaticism. God is the truth of the universe, God(Allah) answers the question of why is there something rather than nothing?
Where did we come from and where are we going?
Pertinent questions that demands answers from everyone, and what of the atheist then? well it should be funny that there are no positive arguments for the inexistence of God. That humans create myths because they want to believe in something, or a psychoanalysis of a child’s behaviour has nothing to do with the creator, but shows our weakness in comprehending who God is. People has since ancient times know that there is something out there, but their understanding can be very primitive.
For example my brother used to think that God was a giraffe with funny spots. I used to think that God was a fisherman with a very big hat. But that is what we used to believe when we were five. A real believer cannot seriously think that God is a vengeful father, or that God would put his feet in hell. Because GOd is ineffable, and incomprehendable by the mind.
The other question Yusuf asked the crowd was that can god do anything? only very few like myself and hamzah didnt pick up our hands. Then he asked, could god bear a son? Could God die? Could God decide to walk on earth? then people put down their hands at once,why? Crowd behaviour,few dared to use their capacity of reason to verify the existence of their lord, they are people who believe in Allah because their fathers did. This was the reason i asked those dangerous questions, muslims are asleep, wake up! Wake up!, wake up!. If you take God’s existence for granted and use really lame arguments to invite people to truth, do you think people will actually listen to you?
IF your tadhkirah only tells people that they are going to be hung by their hair in hell, or that one is going to be pierced with metal in his head if he doesnt believe in god, would he actually follow you? God’s omni benevolence(his kindness) needs to be emphasised. Otherwise even if they know He exists they will think He’s a tyrant God.
Invite (all) to the way of thy Lord with wisdom and beautiful preaching; and argue with them in ways that are best and most gracious: for thy Lord knoweth, best who have strayed from His Path, and who receive guidance.(An-nahl, 125)
All in all, yusuf estes was a good speaker, im looking forward to hearing from Him further.